• Trust Weighted
    Good
  • 5
    Trust Points

tomelce's Review

Summary - Good 3.0

Louder, flashier, funnier than the predecessor, loaded with more ambitious set-pieces and a more self-parodying tone than even the first “Scream.” What “Scream 2” lacks, however, is the same scare factor, and what it adds to the formula is a far-out final twist in the revelation of a villain who doesn’t appear until that point. A good slasher film that basically repeats the original movie to a more Hollywood-serving degree, “Scream 2” has solid performances and good enough production quality to make it worth watching. Still, when compared to “Scream” it feels more superficial and lightweight.

Acting - Very Good 3.5

Acting is pretty solid throughout, with Neve Campbell and Courteney Cox the obvious stand-outs as Sidney and Gale, respectively. David Arquette returns to a few laughs, as does Jamie Kennedy, while a few others, including Timothy Olyphant and Sarah Michelle Gellar, turn in decent supporting turns.

Male Stars - Very Good 3.5

Female Stars - Great 4.0

Female Costars - Very Good 3.5

Male Costars - Very Good 3.5

Film - Very Good 3.5

Direction - Really Great 4.5

Dialogue - OK 2.5

Music - Very Good 3.5

Visuals - Great 4.0

Edge - Risqué 2.2

Sex Innocent 1.3

Violence Brutal 3.2

Rudeness Salty 2.1

Reality - Glib 2.0

Circumstantial - Glib 2.0

Biological - Glib 2.0

Physical - Glib 2.0

More reviews on Scream 2 More reviews by tomelce

© 2006-2024 WikPik, Inc. All rights reserved.

Go to the full ViewGuide