Go in with expectations lowered and laugh your ass off. Self-conciously redundant and even more misanthropic, Part II feels like The Hangover’s hangover. That said, it’s funny as hell. LOL bombs rain down early and often.
It’s also distinctly edgier than the original. Yes that’s possible. The unnatural acts depicted in this outing, along with some cringeworthy mutilations, drive up the edginess rating to 3.9 (Horrid) versus a mere 3.3 (Sordid) for the original. How edgy is that? It makes the sordid Bridesmaids seem quaint.
This edition moves the wild night from Vegas to Bangkok, another city deserving of its own catchphrase (“Bangkok has them now”). The anxious groom is now Ed Helms’ dorky dentist, set to marry a gorgeous Thai girl from a wealthy and proper family. Think the wedding will come off according to plan?
Stanford fans – parents especially – will spit out their chardonnay when they see what becomes of a Stanford ring… and the finger wearing it.
The three main leads established themselves as terrific comic actors the last time out.
Another mostly strong supporting cast mostly helps the movie’s success.
BTW, you gotta love Hollywood casting a Korean-American (Jamie Chung) and a Chinese-American (Mason Lee) as Thais. At least they’re Asian…
Explicit, brutal and vile add up to a horrid level of edginess. Sure it’s funny, yet that doesn’t make it any less horrid. Be warned.
The movie’s conceit is that several normal guys can get drugged, which releases their ids and leads to a wild night of debauchery, none of which gets remembered the morning after, nor follows them home with any lasting consequences. Sure.
Finally, the dorky dentist married a starlet stripper in the first movie, and a gorgeous rich girl in this one. Double sure.
Regarding BrianSez’s Review
“It will be a long uphill climb to make money from a Hangover III.” Truth.