-
Trust Weighted
OK
-
66
Trust Points
Wick's Review
Summary -
OK
2.5
Blade Runner meets Robin Hood In Time. If only Andrew Niccol’s sleek techno-thriller were as good as its antecedents. Well, it’s better than some Robin Hoods, but that’s a low bar.
What In Time is is quintessential Hollywood fantasy:
- No one ages beyond 25, the peak of hotness.
- Speaking of hotties, the movie’s stocked with ’em. Most are disaffected, kinda like the bored dancers in Addicted to Love back in the day.
- The rich are rich because they cheat.
- Marxist economics animate the fallacious rules driving the story.
All of which would be fine if it were more than a one-note story. Sadly it’s not.
Time is money becomes more than just a busy Tinseltown mogul’s mantra. Time really is money In Time. This singular conceit gets played for a series of increasingly lame puns that quickly lose their charm.
Nor are the attractive leads well used. Justin Timberlake & Amanda Seyfried are plenty sexy, yet limited.
Wanna know a real economic injustice in Hollywood? Wasting so many pretty faces.
Then again, fashionably Marxist Hollywood moguls get their chicks for free.
Acting -
Good
3.0
Justin Timberlake & Amanda Seyfried – legitimate movie stars now – have a modicum of chemistry together. Pity that their cliche roles are so limiting.
Pity also that none of the supporting characters outshines them.
- Cillian Murphy makes a competent bad guy, though hardly a villain for the ages.
- Johnny Galecki fares better as an alcoholic factory worker. Nice adult role for The Big Bang Theory’s Leonard.
- Olivia Wilde is always striking, here playing Timberlake’s 50 year old Mom, living in a 25 year old body. Guess that makes her the ultimate MILF.
- Yaya DaCosta has a great name and manages to jump off screen in a bit part as a bereft woman. She did the same in The Kids Are All Right, meaning DaCosta could be a star.
- Vincent Kartheiser is passable as a heartless mogul.
Trivia note: Timberlake, Wilde, Seyfried and Kartheiser acted together in Alpha Dog, a better movie.
Male Stars -
Good
3.0
Female Stars -
Good
3.0
Female Costars -
Good
3.0
Male Costars -
OK
2.5
Film -
OK
2.5
The film looks cool, with a 70s retro futurism style.
Direction -
OK
2.5
Dialogue -
Barely OK
2.0
Music -
OK
2.5
Visuals -
Very Good
3.5
Coldly retro-futuristic, stocked with de-badged E-Types, Cougars and other 60s dreamcars.
Edge -
Risqué
2.1
Sex
Titillating
1.9
Violence
Fierce
1.8
Rudeness
Profane
2.6
Reality -
Supernatural
3.5
Justin Timberlake is 30 in real life, yet plays a perpetual 25 year old In Time.
What’s next? A remake of The Picture of Dorian Gray perhaps.
Circumstantial -
Supernatural
3.4
Biological -
Supernatural
4.0
Physical -
Supernatural
3.2