• Trust Weighted
    Great
  • 83
    Trust Points

Wick's Review

Summary - Great 4.0

Britishly brilliant movie entertainment, what with Victorian-era detective shenanigans done up in state-of-the-art action movie hyper-reality. This latest Sherlock Holmes re-renders Guy Ritchie & Robert Downey Jr’s boldly boffo origin movie from two years ago, complete with the first one’s distinctions.

  • Magnificent visuals? Check. Victorian-era London, Paris and a storybook cliffside castle are presented with intense verisimilitude.
  • Deja vu action scenes? Check. Holmes’ minds-eye visualizes every move of each battle in advance, doubling the action quotient while guaranteeing a supernatural sense of reality.
  • Superstar performance? Check. Downey delivers another dextrously adroit performance, physically and verbally. The actor who essayed Chaplin now is Chaplin, in a 21st Century way. The movie becomes bracing whenever he’s in a scene. Fortunately that’s most every one.
  • Ultimate bromance? Check. Gay? No, old fashioned.

Acting - Very Good 3.5

Robert Downey Jr. makes most of the movie’s magic, notwithstanding the gazillion dollar production values and Guy Ritchie’s visual inventiveness. Downey declaiming is a singular pleasure of the current cinema. Thus he was born to play – and play again – the world’s greatest detective. The multitude of disguises alone give him countless opportunities for verbal mischief. Elementary for him. Delightful for us.

Jude Law makes a smashing Dr. Watson, straight-man extraordinaire in more ways than one.

Supporting Players

  • Noomi Rapace is adequate as a Gypsy seer, in a come-down from her legendary Lisbeth Salander.
  • Rachel McAdams disappoints again, fortunately not taking up as much screen time this go round.
  • Jared Harris makes a twitchy Professor Moriarty. It’s clear why the great Richard Harris’s son never became a leading man.
  • Stephen Fry delights as the other Holmes – Mycroft Holmes. Great name “Mycroft,” like something JK Rowling would invent. Mycroft, brother of “Shirley” Holmes. Leave it to the British. In any case, the surprise introduction of blood kin recalls Sean Connery’s Professor Henry Jones from The Last Crusade. High praise indeed.
  • Kelly Reilly pleases once again in the thankless role of Watson’s faithful betrothed. Thankless perhaps, but nearly every scene she’s in is funny, one downright hilarious. Watch out for that train….

Male Stars - Perfect 5.0

Female Stars - OK 2.5

Female Costars - Good 3.0

Male Costars - Very Good 3.5

Film - Great 4.0

Guy Ritchie fight scenes are more fun than a barrel of drunk monkeys. Time is on his side, what with the trademark presaging technique he used in Snatch and perfected in his first Sherlock Holmes picture.

Direction - Really Great 4.5

Dialogue - Very Good 3.5

Music - Great 4.0

Visuals - Perfect 5.0

Edge - Risqué 1.8

Sex Titillating 1.6

Violence Fierce 2.0

Rudeness Salty 1.8

Reality - Supernatural 3.3

What does it take to place Arthur Conan Doyle’s Victorian detective in IndyJonesian hyper-reality? 90 stuntmen (twice the previous movie) and nearly ten “draughtsmen” as they say in England. Guess those latter are part of how Guy Ritchie built St Paul’s and created Notre Dame de Paris.

Circumstantial - Surreal 3.0

Biological - Supernatural 3.9

Physical - Surreal 3.0

1 Comment

  • Wick Dec 21, 2011 7:15AM

    Regarding BrianSez’s Review
    Here! Here! Holmes was definitely the better movie vs. the new Mission Impossible.

More reviews on Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows More reviews by Wick

© 2006-2025 WikPik, Inc. All rights reserved.

Go to the full ViewGuide