All for one and one for … naught. Paul W.S. Anderson’s CGI-crazy take on The Three Musketeers has some great visuals to recommend it and gobs of silly gimmickry to destroy it. The gimmickry won, meaning the viewer loses. Steer clear.
The movie consists of cockamamie action scenes interspersed with jaw-dropping images of the Louvre, the Tower of London, 17th century Paris and other European marvels. It’s almost worth watching for these historical views, but not quite.
A largely second rate cast and a failed infusion of superamped CGI means the movie deserves to fade into history, even though it self-consciously sets itself up for a sequel.
Sequel? Non merci!
There’s not a francophone in the cast of this largely French story. Instead we get Brits playing French, Germans playing French, even an American playing French, but no French playing French. PitiĆ©
Highlights, such as they are:
The highlight of the movie are shots above and inside Paris, London and various landmarks, e.g., The Louvre, the Tower of London, etc. Anyone familiar with these landmarks will be fascinated.
Its lowlights are futuristic contraptions that would make the makers of Wild Wild West blush. Guy Ritchie’s Sherlock Holmes uses a light touch by comparison.
The violence would be much higher if the scores of people killed by sword and other personal weapons were shown bleeding and dying.
Regarding BigdaddyDave’s Review
You’ve performed a great service Musketeer Dave. I’d toyed with seeing this movie and now am exceedingly grateful I didn’t.