Portraying religious faith amidst tragic hardship is a lot of weight for a mainstream movie to carry. Fortunately Life of Pi features visual wonders and frequent grace notes to lighten the load, resulting in an exhausting if moving cinematic experience.
The movie is taken from the celebrated 2001 novel of the same name, “a head-scratching combination of dense religious allegory, zoological lore and enthralling adventure tale, written with warmth and grace.”1 Celebrated director Ang Lee makes the best of it, in no small measure by using his considerable cinematic gifts and breakthrough CGI to create a key character.
The fanciful story follows an Indian lad from charmed early years through his teenage experience as the sole survivor of a shipwreck, as related in flashback by his adult self. Well, sole survivor other than a Bengal tiger. Yep, boy and tiger bob across the Pacific Ocean in a lifeboat. It’s not a comfortable trip.
In fact, it’s a forced march, albeit an entertaining one because of the interspecies conflict. Pi learns valuable lessons along the way about faith and self. A storyteller’s kicker of an ending makes the entire enterprise more meaningful, though one can be forgiven for being rung out as much as elevated by that point.
Life of PI is worthy of its great acclaim, yet is hardly the cineplex crowd pleaser suggested by the trailers. Go in well fortified and behold the wonders.
Suraj Sharma plays the teen Pi Patel during his extended castaway ordeal, giving him an appealing pluckiness that travels well. Irrfan Khan plays Pi as an adult, soft-spoken in an Eastern meditative way. Ayush Tandon & Gautam Belur play Pi as a young boy. The three kids are newcomers, while Khan is an accomplished actor who can play tough – Slumdog Millionaire – as well as soft.
Sharma’s main costar is the CGI creation known as Richard Parker, an incredibly realistic Bengal tiger. While we normally don’t consider animals or inanimate creations as actors, Richard Parker assuredly is. Often fearsome, ultimately emaciated and beaten down, he represents a terrific life force and does so in tremendously visceral form. So what if he’s a high tech apparition.
Other notables in the small cast:
Ang Lee’s film celebrates the natural world in ways wondrous and manifold. It opens with affecting closeups of zoo animals, several of whom wind up in the lifeboat that is the film’s crucible. It achieves its most spectacular effects in a wondrously luminous ocean full of sea creatures that elevate out of the water, some in schools, others in massively singular fashion.
Then there is the Bengal tiger at the center of it all. We see ourselves when we look in a wild animal’s eyes, the film opines. Magnificent, selfish, elegant – the tiger is us, a point the film makes profoundly.
Notwithstanding these encomiums, this long film takes quite some time to really get rolling, ends up being a bit too episodic, and includes a fantasy sequence that doesn’t really work.
The movie deals with the loss of family and beloved animals, often taken violently. Beware.
At a more gut level, the 3D is well worth it, yet much of the movie takes place on a heaving ocean. Those prone to motion sickness will be queasy, guaranteed.
One could make an argument that the movie’s reality is strictly natural, after the fact. However it clearly tells a story suffused with surrealism, which is how it is rated here.
Regarding BrianSez’s Review
True….
Regarding BrianSez’s Review
“The notable thing about the entire cast is that they are all just so easy to get to know and like. I felt like I’d like them to be my family.” Yep, with the possible exception of Richard Parker.