• Trust Weighted
    OK
  • 71
    Trust Points

BigdaddyDave's Review

Summary - OK 2.5

Lush cinematic imagery, and a decent performance by veteran actor Christoph Waltz can’t overcome a generalized feeling of confusion in the movie Water for Elephants.

Set in 1931, the films tells the take of Jacob (Robert Pattinson), a handsome lad on the verge of finishing veterinary school, who suddenly leaves to join the circus. Filled with a colorful menagerie of animals and circus workers, the train he boards becomes his home, and he must quickly adhere to the odd traditions and exhausting workload set by the boss, Ringmaster August (Waltz).

Subjected to long hours, brutal punishments, and half-sold shows, the circus is always teetering on the verge of bankruptcy. Along the way, Jacob meets Marlena (Reese Witherspoon), the bosses wife, and star of the show.

Neither Witherspoon or Pattinson create enough onscreen chemistry to carry the film, and we are left with an awkward, fish-out-of-water piece that seems to lack a definitive focal point at times.

Waltz is good as the narcissistic boss, always watching over his shoulder, but we’ve seen him in similar roles before. The circus characters are mildly entertaining, but we don’t get to know them well, with the exception of a few roadies.

All in all, this film was mildly entertaining at best.

Acting - OK 2.5

Male Stars - OK 2.5

Pattinson fails to convince me that he has the hard work needed to care for the animals. His inability to generate any onscreen excitement was somewhat disappointing.

Female Stars - OK 2.5

Witherspoon, while somewhat better than Pattinson, also fails to generate any excitement for this project and appears at times to be just going through the motions.

Female Costars - OK 2.5

Male Costars - OK 2.5

Hal Holbrook make a great appearance in the film. Good to see him again.

Film - OK 2.5

Direction - OK 2.5

Methodical and at times predictable.

Dialogue - OK 2.5

Music - Good 3.0

Visuals - Good 3.0

Beautifully filmed, with lush colors and an authentic feel, the visuals were one of the highlights of this film for me.

Edge - Risqué 2.0

Sex Titillating 1.8

no nudity

Violence Brutal 2.6

Some fighting is shown, as are several disturbing scenes of animal abuse. Suffice it to say, it does not paint a glamorous picture of circus handlers.

Rudeness Salty 1.7

mild profanity

Reality - Natural 1.0

Circumstantial - Natural 1.0

Biological - Natural 1.0

Physical - Natural 1.0

1 Comment

  • Wick Apr 23, 2011 10:42AM

    Regarding BigdaddyDave’s Review
    Helpful review BigD. My wife and I are going to the movies tonight and this was one of the possibilities. Was.

More reviews on Water for Elephants More reviews by BigdaddyDave

© 2006-2025 WikPik, Inc. All rights reserved.

Go to the full ViewGuide